Trump’s Plan Could Crush Dollar Strength & Boost BTC

The tariff debate resurfaced strongly on Inauguration Day 2026. A widely shared post highlighted new economic studies on tariffs. The message questioned long-standing protectionist claims. It argued tariffs hurt Americans more than foreign nations. The timing added political weight to the discussion. Policy direction remains under close scrutiny.

💥BREAKING:

Multiple new studies show that tariffs primarily hurt Americans, not foreigners. pic.twitter.com/O197au36aK

— Crypto Rover (@cryptorover) January 20, 2026

What the Studies Are Showing

Recent research paints a clear picture. Tariffs raise costs across the economy. Most of the burden falls on domestic consumers. Companies often pass higher import costs to buyers. This leads to higher prices on everyday goods. The effect spreads quickly through supply chains. Inflation pressure increases as a result.

Goldman Sachs released updated findings in late 2025. The data showed U.S. consumers absorb about 55% of tariff costs. Businesses take on some burden as well. Foreign exporters pay the least share. This challenges claims that tariffs punish overseas producers. The numbers suggest the opposite outcome.

Harvard Research Confirms Inflation Impact

Harvard economists reached similar conclusions. Their research linked tariffs to a 0.7% rise in consumer prices. Low- and middle-income households feel the impact the most. These groups spend a higher share on goods. Tariffs act like hidden taxes. The effect is broad and hard to avoid.

Foreign exporters often adjust pricing strategies. Some shift supply chains. Others reduce margins slightly to stay competitive. Many costs still move downstream. U.S. importers and retailers fill the gap. Consumers then pay more at checkout. This limits the pressure on foreign economies.

Political Messaging vs Economic Reality

Tariffs are often framed as tools of strength. They are marketed as protection for local jobs. However, economic data tells a different story. The benefits are narrow and short-lived. The costs are wide and persistent. This gap fuels debate among economists and policymakers.

Households face higher prices on food, electronics, and clothing. Small businesses also struggle with rising input costs. Profit margins tighten quickly. Some firms cut hiring or raise prices further. Wage growth rarely keeps pace. This reduces real purchasing power over time.

Market Reactions and Investor Concerns

Markets closely watch trade policy signals. Tariff uncertainty increases volatility. Investors price in slower growth and higher inflation. Risk assets often react negatively. Long-term planning becomes harder for companies. Confidence weakens when costs remain unpredictable.

The studies add pressure to revisit tariff policies. Lawmakers face growing evidence against broad tariffs. Targeted measures may replace blanket approaches. Economic data will play a bigger role in decisions. The debate is far from over. However, the evidence is becoming harder to ignore